Michael Moore – Hate America First – Do We Get an Amen?

“My uncle killed by sniper in WW2. We were taught snipers were cowards. Will shoot u in the back. Snipers aren’t heroes.” – Michael Moore (Leftist Filmmaker) on the film American Sniper

“People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.” – George Orwell

Not that Orwell was a bastion of conservatism (far from it), but he did understand evil; especially evil in the form of oppressive government and power.

Today, Michael Moore (and many, many on the left) are hypocrites; enjoying the freedoms this nation bestows upon her citizens while at the same time despising and slandering the men who bought that freedom with their lives. Moore thrives and profits on selling lies and slander (as do many on the left). And then Moore uses his millions in attacks meant to destroy the American freedoms and values that made his success even possible.

When you leftist out there bitch and moan about being labeled as “Hate America Fist”, remember it is the likes of Michael Moore that correctly foster that label… and your silence just adds an “amen”.

Wendy Davis Now Free to Expose Campaign Lies

As we reflect on the (hopefully) final ticking seconds off Wendy Davis’ fifteen minutes of fame; she exposes us to a common but persistent trait of the liberal mindset. Asked if she regrets anything concerning he failed campaign for Texas Governor, Wendy said “There is one thing that I would do differently in that campaign and it relates to the position that I took on open carry… I made a quick decision on that with a very short conversation with my team and it wasn’t really in keeping with what I think is the correct position on that issue… Though I certainly support people’s right to own and to bear arms in appropriate situations, I fear with open carry, having watched that issue unfold during the campaign, that it will be used to intimidate and cause fear. And this was the only time I felt like I’d strayed a bit from that.” Leftist politicians must often lie to hide who they really are in order to be viably electable. But then once the election is over (win or lose) they fret that their progressive credentials may be damaged in the eyes of their comrades. They panic and reveal the lie using the excuses of evolving, or being misunderstood. The really good practitioners of the leftist arts tell us they never changed at all, but rather it was us (the unwashed) who were too stupid to understand what they were really saying. In Wendy’s case it was a decision she and (more importantly) her team got wrong. Wendy Davis really didn’t support open carry before or after the “short conversation with [her]team”. She knew it. Her team knew it. In that meeting they didn’t decide after careful consideration that they supported the issue, but rather that they would lie about their support of the issue for political expediency. Now since that lie didn’t pay any dividends and the election is over Wendy feels she can safely take a swipe at the second amendment and it’s supporters (who had the gall to not be fooled by her lie). Her coming clean is also meant to reassure her leftist comrades that she was and is still in their camp. Also notice Wendy’s statement that she supports the second amendment “in appropriate situations”. While this may be true in her mind, she intentionally makes a point to omit the details of “appropriate situations”. It’s another lie wrapped in semantics, and Wendy like much of the left is an artists when it comes to this practice. I assure you that the “appropriate situations” are not the freedoms we enjoy today. Yet she conveniently never found the opportunity to verbalize those situations in the campaign (a lie of omission). Given a chance (the Governorship) Wendy would have moved Texas forward with her un-verbalized appropriate leftist restrictions. But, alas, this is Texas. Unfortunately not all politicians of Wendy’s sort are limited by Texas’ common sense. Thus… you can keep you doctor, until it’s obvious you can’t; you support the sanctity of marriage, until the polls swing your way; you support the pipeline, as long as you never have to actually vote on it; you want the greatest military in the world, as you gut it behind the scenes… The point is, leftist often support issues key to our Constitution, freedom, and social fabric… until they evolve, or reevaluate, or whatever liberals do. It’s a way of sitting in the middle of the road (with you right-hand blinker on) until circumstances or opportunity compel you to turn left. In truth a progressive never supports these issues from the beginning. They were always going to turn left, but choose to subversively undermine hated issues and polices while misleading the public on their true stance. BUT when the undermining is complete (or in Wendy’s case ineffective), they are free (even compelled) to reveal their true colors. On behalf of those who really do support the Second Amendment (and freedom, and the social fabric, and the rest of the Constitution) I would like to thank Wendy Davis to affirming our suspicions. It’s good to know the leftist bull-sh!t meter is still working just fine. Now, Wendy Davis; please… go away… 14:56… 57… 58… 59… :)

Unimpressed

(Click on the cartoon to enlarge)

Haranguing the Multitudes

Looking forward to 2015… :)

(Click on the cartoon to enlarge)

Pope Francis – Not a Fan

I have to admit that I’m no fan of the Pope Francis. I tried to keep an open mind on the man, but I believe he has repeatedly demonstrated he is “of this world” and not the next; concerned with numbers, and politics, and political correctness, at the expense of truth and the way.

These are the reasons WHY I am no fan of this Pope…

Why? Sacrificing Truth:
Francis seems concerned with building membership (numbers) within his (not His) church. That fine, but only when truth is not sacrificed in that endeavor. Pope Francis seems to either not know the truth or is unconcerned with advocating it (Him).

Why? Political Correctness:
Francis seems to bow to political correctness, a very worldly pagan god. In May 2013 he answered the theological question of “If even atheists have been redeemed by Jesus?” by saying “Even them, everyone.” He proceeded to beat around the bush by including. “We all have the duty to do good… Just do good, and we’ll find a meeting point.” (See
Jesus, Redemption, Atheists, Works, and the Pope

Technically his answer is true. Jesus’ blood did redeem everyone. What it did not do was lead to everyone’s salvation. We conservatives have been criticized with equating his remarks concerning redemption with salvation. True… but the world (left) has doubly used this statement to equate the two. And that’s the problem. If my words were misconstrued to advocate such a heretical idea, I would do everything in my power to correct the misconception. Pope Francis has made no such effort; and I now assume this has been his intent all along.

Pope Francis is also correct that “we’ll find a meeting point”; but where he is wrong is that “just do good” will be good enough (for anyone). At the judgment seat no one will be “good” enough by his own merit. It’s a basic tenet of the Christian faith.

A misconception of his original message would have been a perfect opportunity to clarify that key message of our Lord and Savior. It was an opportunity missed. Why? Numbers and political correctness. We can’t go and offend the world. It’s just not done in this day and age.

Why? Moral Equivalence:
More recently it has been revealed that Pope Francis has been key in pushing the Obama administration to begin normalizing relations with Cuba. Step one was to release five Cuban spies for one American hostage. The leader of the five Cubans released was linked to downing two civilian planes operated by the U.S.-based dissident group Brothers to the Rescue, in which four men died. Thus he was serving TWO life sentences. Today, he is now in Cuba after a heroes welcome home.

This “deal” should be no surprise to anyone. This is the same President and administration that traded five high level terrorists for one deserter; the same administration that is systematically emptying Gitmo even though the terrorists released often return to the battle field intent to kill Americans. And the left is indignant when it is suggested that they hate the United States, or at best see a moral equivalence between us and our enemies?

So why not restore relations with a dictatorship on our front doorstep that almost ushered in nuclear Armageddon half a century ago and continues today to be one of the most ruthless, and oppressive regimes in the world? From the leftist perspective (which seems to include the Pope), the only thing wrong with the Cuban Communist system is that better leftist (such as themselves) are not in control. Then there IS that moral equivalence thing.

Why? Embracing the Most Pagan of Today’s False Religions:
Now (late 2014) it has been announced that Pope Francis will issue a lengthy proclamation (to Catholics), address the UN general assembly, and call a summit of the world’s main religions. On what pressing subject is the Pope concerned? Climate Change… Pope Francis hopes to influence next year’s crucial UN Climate Change meeting in Paris.

Why, I ask, does it not surprise me that this Pope would embrace the most fraudulent, snake oil selling, oppressive, pagan, religions of the 21’st century? The god Baal (see the Profit Elijah) had more credibility that these delinquents.

The only logical conclusion I can deduce concerning Pope Francis? He’s just another secular leftist in a dangerous position. How can one tell? Matthew 7:15-20

I Miss You Guys!

In the passenger car of a train sat Bill Clinton, George Bush, a spectacular looking blonde and a frightfully awful looking old lady. After several minutes of the trip, the train passes through a dark tunnel, and the unmistakable sound of a slap is heard. When the train exists the tunnel and there is light again Clinton had a big red slap mark on his cheek.

(1) The blonde thought – “That rascal Clinton wanted to touch me and by mistake, he must have put his hand on that old lady, who in turn must have slapped his face”

(2) The old lady thought – “That dirty old Bill Clinton laid his hands on the blonde and she smacked him”.

(3) Bill Clinton thought – “George put his hand on that blonde and by mistake she slapped me”.

(4) George Bush thought – “I hope there’s another tunnel soon so I can smack Clinton again”.

(I would say I miss these guys… but #$@%!, at this point I miss Jimmy Carter.) :)

Sony, the United States, and the Yappy Little Dog

So the North Koreans (allegedly) hacked Sony Pictures because of a movie the studio was about to release. The movie parodied the assassination of Korean dictator Kim Jong-un. Let’s take a look at what these recent events tells us.

Sony’s Response (Panic):
Sony has obviously been in a panic concerning the hack. This panic has nothing to do with the cancellation of a movie and the costs involved in that. That’s chump change to the likes of Sony. No. Sony is concerned with the information, the data, their tormentors now possess.

They’ve gotten a taste of what can happen with the limited emails released over the last month. Luckily for Sony the MSM (Main Stream Media) has protected the leftist executives\producers for ideological reasons. (See more on this below) Unfortunately, Sony realizes that what has been released so far is probably just the tip of the ice-berg. And the MSM blind eye may have it’s limits.

Sony’s Response (Canceling the Film):
Sony withdrew the film and has caught a lot of grief (including from President Obama) over doing so. It has been kind of humorous to watch this since Sony has been one of those leftist corporate supporters of Obama. They were actually surprised when thrown under the bus. :) Why do people, organizations, and companies do that? I would remind them that Obama threw his own dead grandmother under the bus for political expediency. Why exactly would anyone dealing with Obama be surprised to find themselves there?

Me? I’m not so tough on Sony (for now) concerning the pulling of the movie. Sony had little choice. Few (if any) theaters/distributers were willing to show it. You can’t blame the makers of a product for “pulling” it when the stores refuse to put it on the shelf. Now with that said, it seems that Sony has found a venue for a limited release. That’s a good PR move. They should keep going and as a bonus they may even recoup expenses or even make a profit.

The Information Released by the Hackers: (The Good)
One of the good results of this incident is the information (mostly email) dumped by the hackers concerning leftist Hollywood. This information has exposed Hollywood as bunch of hypocritical assholes, nuts, and even racists. It’s nothing we didn’t already know… but confirmation of suspicions every now and then is a warm fuzzy thing.

In particular, Sony Pictures co-chairwoman Amy Pascal (a major leftist Democratic and Obama donor) was caught exchanging racist emails concerning Obama with producer Scott Rudin. She’s now finds herself under a lot of pressure and leftist groups are turning on her. She pees on herself a little bit every time she hears a bus roll down the street now. In damage control mode Amy said “The content of my emails were insensitive and inappropriate but are not an accurate reflection of who I am.”

Really? This is kind of like the “I was drunk” excuse. But it has been my experience that the words of a drunk is the mind of a one who is sober. What Amy really said was “Can’t you see I’m a leftist. A leftist dammit! I get a pass on crap like this! Lokk! Mel Gibson!” Amy’s problem is that there are thousands of leftist hacks that can do her job; thousands without the stink of exposed bigotry. Sony will let things die down and the quietly, stealthily… throw her under a bus.

On to producer Scott Rudin, who took a different tact; one of misdirection. “This is not about salacious emails being batted around by Gawker and Defamer, It’s about a criminal act, and the people behind it should be treated as nothing more nor less than criminals.” Sony has even tried to shame and threaten news organizations not to report what was found in the “private” emails. This could be seen as really impressive chutzpah (Jewish cojones) if it weren’t so laughable. :)

I remember a certain former conservative Governor and Vice-Presidential candidate who had her email hacked years ago. I also remember a certain commentator on Fox news suffering the same theft of proprietary email and information. Did these leftist have any qualms about that illegally obtained material being used by the media. Show me one leftist editorial with that sentiment and I’ll consider the argument remotely valid; but I won’t be holding my breath.

If the “criminals” are caught, by all means see to it that they are prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Put your buddy Obama on the case. Good luck with that. :) But the content of your emails and your character is… news. If you are exposed as racist hypocritical assholes, it’s your own dam fault. And if Sony doesn’t want to be seen as a horde of racist hypocritical assholes, maybe they should lean less left in the future. Call it the free market deciding you fate. :)

Now to the not so good…

The Big Picture (China):
Normally we would think of North Korea as an annoying yappy little dog. Unfortunately (due to U.S. pussy-diplomacy over the last decade) NK is a yappy little dog with with a budding nuclear program and an emboldened megalomaniac. The owners of the yappy little dog (China) feign surprise but are “secretly” delighted that “Little Chubby” (their code name for Kim Jong-un) constantly nips at heels of an emasculated world power.

This is China… “Oh look, our yappy little dog is biting you on the ass again. What can we do? He is an out of control bad yappy little dog… Ooooh, did he bite you there? That has gotta hurt…”

The Big Picture (Cyber-Terror):
When it comes to cyber-terror capability, the CIA actually ranks North Korea in the top five in the world. It’s amazing what capabilities one little megalomaniac can accrue when he shifts resources that should feed hundreds of thousands of citizens to instead wage war.

I think the attack on Sony by NK was two things. One, the lashing out of a mentally troubled loser (Kim Jong-un) and two, a test of NKs cyber-terror capabilities.

The test side of things is what we should be worried about; because it seems to have been a complete success. For now… but don’t forget, Barry’s on the job.

Speaking of which, we are assured by President Barry (Obama) that we will respond “proportionally” and “at a time of our own choosing”. Perhaps the outage of internet in NK for a several hours the other day was that proportional & timely response. That’ll teach ‘em…

Great Leader Obama unfortunately shared with us (and NK) that he believes this to be an more act of “cyber-vandalism” and an “act of war”. And ISIS/ISIL was just a “junior varsity” team of terrorists wannabes. It’s bad enough we can’t properly fight the war on terror; but it seems we can’t even defend ourselves against or properly teach a lesson to a yappy little dog like Kim Jong-un.