Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Muslim’

Political - Right - Looking at the MoneyUnder Islamic law, there is a thing called jizya which is basically a tax levied on non-Muslims in an Islamic state. It was meant to be material proof that non-Muslims accepted the subjection to Islam and its laws. In return the non-Muslims are “permitted” to practice their faith [yeah right], and “enjoy” the “protection” of the Islamic state from outside aggression.

“The intention of taking the Jizya is not to approve the disbelief of non-Muslims in Islam, but rather to spare their lives and to give them some time; in hope that during it; they might stop to reflect on the virtues of Islam and its compelling arguments, and consequently converting from disbelief to belief. That’s why it’s important to pay the jizya with humiliation and servility, because naturally, any sensible person can not stand humiliation and servility. So if the disbeliever is given some time watching the pride of Islam and hearing evidences of its authenticity, then apparently this might carry him to convert to Islam, and that’s the main rationale behind the enactment of the jizya.” — Abu Abdullah Muhammad ibn Umar ibn al-Husayn al-Taymi al-Bakri al-Tabaristani Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (yes, that’s his name); aka Fakhruddin Razi; Persian Sunni Muslim theologian and philosopher (1149 – 1209)

[Translation: Jizya is Islamic sanctioned extortion of subjugated peoples. But maybe I’m not being very understanding of Islamic “culture”.]

Jizya on people goes hand in hand with jizya from conquered cities in the form of “tribute”; or nations in the form of payments in order for their ships to not be pirated (or not be pirated as much as they would without the payments). In other words, the civilized world has had to put up with this crap for centuries from the “religion of peace”.

Jizya goes hand in hand with Al-taqiyya which is basically Islamic sanctioned lying; especially to non-believers. The circumstances under which it’s OK to lie? They are just too numerous to list.

Qur’an (3:28) – Muslims are not to take those outside the faith as friends… Unless it is under false pretenses to protect themselves. One would guess this could be applied to a national level when it comes to treaties and agreements.

Qur’an (2:225) – Allah will not hold you to account for breaking your oaths as long as your intention (faithfulness to Allah and Islam) is good. [Want to further the interest of Islam which can really mean the interest of any Muslim… It’s OK, lie your ass off.]

Qur’an (66:2) – “Allah has already ordained for you, (O men), the dissolution of your oaths” so when it comes to lying… again, knock yourselves out.

Qur’an (3:54) – “And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers.” [The Arabic word for “scheme” used here is makara which literally means “deceit”.] [So finally some common ground. Allah is a the best of deceivers and he gives encouragement for his followers to follow his example.]

So why am I bringing up two Islamist laws or traditions, or whatever you want to call them? Because both Jizya and Al-taqiyya are practiced today; especially in the hearts and minds of Islamic terrorists. Where these fundamental Islamic ideals stand with “moderate” Muslims; it’s hard to say.

Take for example the most recent Islamist terrorist contribution to American society; Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. They were on the dole for most (if not all) their lives here in the United States. Why? Well besides the obvious reasons of their family being general losers… welfare was owed to them… by right of Islamic law.

Islamic clerics (of both terrorists and “moderate” variety) have identified western social programs as a form of jizya that Muslims are entitled to and should take advantage of. It is owed them simply because they are Muslim. How convenient that jiyza being payment to an “Islamist state” seems to be one of those optional parts of the Qur’an…

Political Cartoon - Wellfare for Terrorist

It has finally been disclosed that the family of the two Boston Marathon terrorists received over $100,000 over the last ten years in cash, food stamps, housing, and other welfare benefits (no word on college assistance yet). This information finally came out despite the best efforts if leftist Democrats like Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick who actually said he didn’t want the information released in order to protect the “privacy” of the dead terrorist.

Basically these people where losers and bums living on the dole. They didn’t have any appreciation for the assistance. It was owed to them even as the mother perpetrated crimes like shoplifting (Why do I get the feeling theft from non-Muslim is probably excused in the Qur’an somewhere?) Stealing? Non-Muslims? Knock yourself out…

And finally jiyza/welfare was owed to them even as the sons prepared to kill and maim those who paid it. Again it seems the part of the jiyza that prescribes the non-Muslims enjoying rights and/or protection for paying it is optional… probably excused as part of Al-taqiyya (lying) to those despicable infidels.

Looking back. Had we actually required these dirt-bags to support themselves; maybe they would never have come here in the first place. Second, maybe they wouldn’t have had so much time to travel, train, research, and implement terror.

Often we hear from various nuts that WE (the U.S.) sponsor terror… I just never expected it to be the terrorist attacking us and supported by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and by extension the U.S. taxpayer.

Political - Left - War is Terrorism with a Bigger Budget

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Atheist - Blank PamphletSo here’s the Reuters headline: “U.N. told atheists face discrimination around globe”

Think about that headline for a second and what it means. What if you didn’t read any further; what impression do you have of the global treatment of “atheist”.

Now move on to reality and the Reuters “reporting” behind that headline.

This comes (as many stupid, stupid, things often do) from the United Nations.

The U.N. “Human Rights Council” came up with this finding; “Extensive discrimination by governments against atheists, humanists and the non-religious occurs worldwide.”

And to back it up they tell us “In Afghanistan, Iran, Maldives, Mauritania, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Sudan atheists can face the death penalty on the grounds of their belief.” “These nations effectively criminalize atheism (and) the expression and manifestation of atheist beliefs.” Notice anything that all these nations (that represent the whole world) have in common? The U.N. and Reuters sure don’t.

OK… Let me state the obvious. These backward Muslim (redundant) nations persecute EVERYONE who isn’t MUSLIM and these morons at the U.N. interpret that as discrimination against atheists AND that this represents a GLOBAL phenomenon.

Has the U.N. or Reuters even paid attention to world events over the past few years (or decades). There is practically always a Christian (usually trying to spread the gospel) on the edge of being executed in one of these Muslim nations. AND Islamic nations have stated goals to “drive the Jews into the sea” (meaning kill ALL Jews). They have a habit of sending barrages of missiles and bombs into Israel almost daily. And the U.N. conclusion is that atheists are the ones persecuted?

Religion - Islam - Violent

Again, don’t get me wrong; atheists are persecuted… but nowhere near to the extent of Jews or Christians. But the U.N. hates Jews and Christians. Atheists, they like just fine so to them that’s the problem to be exposed and hopefully solved.

This is how propaganda works. It’s horrible that we support an organization (the U.N.) that pushes this crap. It’s even worse that our “free press” (Reuters) just passes it along as news. When you read the facts the real headline should have been “Islamist nations discriminate and persecute Jews, Christians, and even atheists (in that order) and want to force the West to do the same.”

Whoa… TexasLynn… what do you mean by “force the West to do the same.”

Meanwhile these Muslim nations, through the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), are trying to use the U.N. to “obtain a world ban on denigration of religion, especially what they call ‘Islamophobia’.” Translation: “We’ve made it illegal to criticize Islam in our nation and we want to push that on the West through the United Nations.

[TexasLynn Note: This is a perfect example why I say that certain cultures (and religions) are just not compatible with freedom and democracy.]

So, on one hand the U.N. issues a report that the barbarians persecute atheist and other “free thinkers” (and they do); practically ignoring this persecution is for worse against others… And on the other hand the U.N. entertains the bastards when they use the organization to try and force the West into legally adopting this persecution.

Question: Where are the “Moderate Muslims”? Why aren’t we hearing their voices of reason?
Answer: Moderate Muslims are a myth. They are LITERALLY as numerous as unicorns in this day and age. I would love to be proven wrong; but the sound of crickets is all I ever hear from these guys.

Religion - Islam - Moderate Myth

Question: Why is the United Nations even giving these %$#@^ the time of day.
Answer: They are leftist morons.

Question: Why did the U.N. (and Reuters) use Islamic persecution to push the leftist propaganda like “atheists face discrimination around globe”.
Answer: They are leftist morons.

Question: Why do we (the U.S.) still belong to and financially support the United Nations?
Answers: Our leaders are leftist morons; or spineless cowards.

Read Full Post »

Did I say Hate may be too strong?

I’ve always said that in its core, maybe semi-subconsciously, always bubbling up here and there… the left hates the U.S. of America. OK, maybe “hate” is too strong; but the left does show disdain for America and often sympathizes with her enemies.

Today:
Today, if you go to leftist rallies or protests; you can easily find images of Marx, Lennon, and Che Guevara. You’re much more likely to see the American flag burned, pooped on, or some other form of desecration.

Today the left tries to paint the Republicans, the Tea Party and Christians as they are themselves; as an angry, hate-filled, intolerant, mob. They support free speech only when it parrots their doctrine.

Embracing our enemies but no so much Free Speech

Today, the left embraces Islam as a “religion of peace”. They refuse to even use the words “terrorism” or “terrorists”. And when someone points out actions or words that aren’t so peaceful, they are labeled Islamophobic.

An Example:
An example of the blind embrace of our enemies: We have an attack on our embassy in Benghazi on September 11th no less. Our ambassador and two former marines protecting him are murdered. Any moron would instinctively know it was an organized Islamic terrorist attack based on two facts immediately available: 1) the attackers were well armed & 2) It happened on 9/11. But not the left (including our current Administration)… Noooo… they parrot the words of the terrorist that this was a “spontaneous protest” caused by some dumb-ass movie trailer. They even have the guy who made the trailer arrested.

Nothing New:
It was recently brought to my attention (by Dennis Prager) that the left’s disdain for America is nothing new; which in hindsight is obvious.

During the cold war, the left secretly adored the Communists while hating the anti-Communists. The anti-Communists were evil and judgmental; not protecting the way of life that has brought us freedom and prosperity for generations.

Why:
Over the decades, we see the left’s same attitude; same embrace of our enemies; and same elitist, snobbish, disdain. They have no interest in restoring America; because the great things she was and has achieved are embarrassments to the left. Thus they want to “fundamentally change” America; and unfortunately have to a large extent succeeded.

So I ask myself why this is so. Why does the left have such disdain for the country that has given them so much?

The explanation is this: Those who do not hate evil hate those who do hate evil. – Dennis Prager

Read Full Post »

  • The DNC removed the term “God given” in one section the platform describing people’s potential.
  • The DNC platform dropped the recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. The removed wording was “Jerusalem is and will remain the capital of Israel.”
  • The DNC platform dropped its stance “to isolate Hamas until it renounces terrorism, recognizes Israel’s right to exist, and abides by past agreements.”
  • The DNC added much more emphasis on climate change (previously referred to as global warming). (18 references)
  • The DNC mentions the deficit half as much as climate change. (9 references)
  • The DNC omitted any reference to the balancing the budget. (0 references)
  • The DNC strengthened its support of abortion on demand.
  • The DNC added support for same-sex marriage.
  • There are a record number of Muslim delegates attending the DNC. (about 100)
  • There are a record number of gay delegates attending the DNC. (about 400)

I’m not saying that any one of these is good or bad. I just think they help reveal what the Democratic Party stands for.

Read Full Post »

(Warning: The following is not for the squeamish or politically current. It doesn’t pull punches. If you are easily offended by someone who doesn’t tolerate evil it would be best that you just move on.)

Islam - Religion of Peace

The U.S. military accidentally burns a few Korans in Afghanistan and the nut-balls throw a fit. So President Obama and various other government officials send various apologies and the result is more fits and more violence.

I’ll be honest; I’m fed up with this crap. Doesn’t any leader in this country have the balls to tell the sons-of-bitches to shut the $#@% up! It’s a freakin’ book! That’s it; that’s all! If their faith had anything behind it they would be more concerned about the words and ideas than about the ink and paper.

I might understand their outrage if these bastards showed one ounce of tolerance for anybody else and I mean anybody. But their “holy book” tells them to enslave and kill all non-believers. They are taught to hate the Jews and drive them into the sea. Israel must be destroyed (and along with it the West and the U.S.). *^$%^! They’re not even civilized enough to tolerate each other because Mohamed’s 2nd cousins didn’t quite agree on the color of Mohamed’s favorite goat.

But TexasLynn, you just don’t understand their culture. I think I understand it just fine. And I’ve got just a couple of questions. Where would these people be if not for the oil under their ground and through that the riches and blessings of Western culture, and technology? A hint… they’d all generally be pooping in holes they dug behind their tents.

I’ve read enough of the Koran to see just how vile it is! To imply that Allah is the same God as that of the Jews and Christians is ignorant, insulting, and blasphemous! I’ve seen the terror in Daniel Pearls eyes! I’ve seen the planes fly into the World Trade Center and people jumping to their deaths to escape the flames. I’ve seen them try and build a triumphant Mosque just blocks away, practically pissing on the graves of our fallen. I’ve seen them kill innocents again and again… I know! I know exactly what “Allah Akbar” means.

But TexasLynn, these are the acts of radicals misinterpreting the Koran and defiling Islam which is a religion of peace. Really, because the Koran I read didn’t talk about a whole lot of peace. And when it comes to the sane, civilized Muslims… Your silence is deafening! The only people I hear from is CAIR and they’re part problem. Telling me I MUST be more tolerant of this bullshit. Guess where you can stick that message!

Islam and those that practice it peacefully (if you are out there?); these nuts are YOUR problem. YOU should be addressing them. Why does the West (and specifically the U.S.) have to clean up your crap?! YOU should be doing it… all the while apologizing to us that you allowed it to get this bad!

I WANT AN APOLOGY DAMMIT!

Read Full Post »

Mission Accomplished

I don’t mean this as a slam to Obama. But before we get all giddy about the death or deposition of all these tyrants in the Middle East we should remember the environment we’re working in. The greed, hatred, violence, and corruption are rampant and ingrained in the culture.

The Muslim culture has been so tainted by Islam that things like freedom and democracy are highly unlikely to take root. Do I mean this as a criticism of Islam? Yes. Do I mean this as a criticism of Muslims? Not completely. The Muslim culture is both the victim and facilitator; kind of like the German people during the Nazi regime.

I am not optimistic concerning the Arab Spring. We are more likely to see new tyrants replace the old; more Sharia Law, more persecution of Christians, and more terrorists. I hope I’m wrong, but I’m not.

Read Full Post »

Bobby Ghosh

Bobby Ghosh, Time Magazines Deputy International Editor, recently stated the following concerning rioting by Muslims because of Quran burnings in the U.S.:

“The real concern now is that this spreads from here. That you have in other small groups of extremists in other parts of the Muslim world that people feel they have to do a copy-cat thing. We saw that happen many years ago with Salman Rushdie. We saw that happen much more recently with the Danish cartoons.

The thing to keep in mind that’s very important here is that the Quran to Muslims; it’s not the same as the Bible to Christians. The Bible is a book written by men. It’s acknowledged by Christians as written by men. It’s the story of Jesus. But the Koran if you’re a believer, if you’re a Muslim, is directly the word of God. Not written by man. It is transcribed as directly the word of God. That makes it sacred in a way that’s hard to understand if you not Muslim. So the act of burning the Quran is potentially much more inflammatory than if you were to burn a Bible.”

Really? And what exactly makes Bobby Ghosh an expert on what Christians believe?

His point of view would overwhelmingly have to come from a combination of one or two perspectives.

The Liberal Perspective
As an employee of Time magazine; it is an easy deduction that Ghosh is a leftist. And from that perspective his statements should be no surprise. He would be no different than any other liberal discussing Christian faith. The concept of God is so alien, and their blind hatred for anything Christian is so profound, they can’t help but make fools of themselves when discussing the subject.

It’s even worse to watch one try to fake it; usually a politician running for office. They mangle the verses, quotes and teachings; making it clear to believers that they are hypocrites. They are wolves trying to pass themselves off as sheep; but doing so very badly.

They (liberals) defend Islam only from the vague idea that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”. They have no clue that Muhammad would have his followers slit their throats as quickly as ours once their role as useful idiots was complete.

The Muslim Perspective
Then again, this guy (Bobby Ghosh) is Indian and may be a Muslim himself (though I don’t think so); which would make him just as uniquely qualified to tell us what Christians believe. The Islamic faith has no problem with lying about or to infidels to further this “religion of peace.”

The Difference
Burning the Bible WOULD be the same as burning the Quran; except for… we Christians would tolerate the slight as commanded by our Savior, whereas mobs of murderous Muslims would not… as commanded by their “Profit.”

“Religion of Peace?” Yeah right…

— Hat Tip Mayrant&Rave

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »