Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘gay’

Preface: Western Society is in the throws of suicide. “Why We’re Doomed”, is a series that exposes the proofs of societal decay as we slouch towards our ultimate end.

Introduction:

The woke geniuses at Marvel Comics recently decided they needed to reboot one of their series. The “New Warriors” franchise was created back in the 90s. It featured cutting edge teen superheroes and was meant to be a junior version of the Avengers.

Of course, teens from the 90s are now in the 30s and 40s today. Soooo… it’s time to bring in a new team of teen superheroes that better represent teens in the 2020s.

The Team:

Thus Marvel presents the new “New Warriors” featuring.

“Snowflake” and “Safespace” (I’m not kidding)
A twin brother and sister team that sport short butch hairstyles. Safespace is the dude who wears a pink costume (with pink hair) and can create forcefields but only for others. Snowflake is the chick (but she is “nonbinary” and prefers other pronouns). She (or whatever) wears a blue uniform with blue hair (get it?) and can create snowflakes that act as throwing stars.

Trailblazer
Trailblazer may be the “leader” of the team if that’s allowed. She is a fat chick with a magic backpack. And that’s about all we know… (No, no, really; I know as I keep writing, you’re going to think I’m making this up, but I’m not.)

Screentime
Screentime is an Asian kid (I think) whose superpower is constant and continual access to the internet. (I know… really, this is not a joke.)

B-Negative
B-Negative is a goth vampire teenager. So… another diversity checkmark, I guess.

Gay Beto
And finally, there is Gay Beto. He is everything Beto, but he’s gay! (OK, OK, I made this last one up… but you have to admit, it would fit right in.)

Conclusion:

If you had brought together the brightest and most talented minds from the whole population of unwoke deplorables and told them to come up with a satire team of “New Warriors” to poke fun at the sad state of Western society… they could not have topped this. Marvel didn’t cover all the bases of asinine diversity and inclusion, but they sure as hell tried.

The point is, THIS is what Marvel thinks best represents the up-and-coming generation. And they may be right. If so, I weep for this nation and this world.

Read Full Post »

GOP - Trump - LogoSo I’m watching a news program featuring a bunch of Trump supporters and one in particular stood out in my mind. The gentleman identified himself as gay (though not trans-gendered) and complimented Trump on not bothering with the issue of where he peed and was concentrating on more important issues.

This gentleman helped me clarify several things in my mind…

One: New Republican Voters
Trump and his supporters keep bragging about the record number of new voters he will bring to the Republican Party. This (I suspect) is the quality of the new voter. And if this is the new inclusive Republican Party, I’ll have no part in it. In Trumps defense, this is exactly what the establishment GOP has been pushing for years. But when politicians (and shysters) brag about “growing the party” or creating a “big tent” they are simply using codes words for “compromising conservative principles” as the price to be paid for winning, and power, and money which are their real goals. That’s a trade-off I’m never going to be interested in. If you become your enemy to win the war, have you really won the war? Of course not.

Two: The Election is Already Settled
The 2016 election is already lost. Trump (by his nature) and his followers assure it. There will be no game unless he’s the nominee. They will support nobody else… So Hillary wins and the GOP most likely looses the Senate (if not the House also). It’s a done deal.

In all fairness, I’m no better. I’ll support Trump under no circumstances. BUT also to be fair I was never going to support Bush, or Christie, or Kasich for the same reason as I won’t support Trump. None are conservatives and I’ve vowed never to support another non-conservative for office. Romney was the last. The GOP label is not enough anymore; nor is throwing me a VP bone. I’ve abandoned the GOP and my sole hope for this election cycle is that it tears the GOP apart and creates one of two new parties. I hope the same for the Democrats in the near future.

Insane - StampThree: National Insanity
Western civilization is in the throws of committing suicide by reason of insanity. How long that will take I have no idea; but the process is now at full speed. The new Trump supporter is aghast that we’re having the debate over restrooms. So am I… but for a different reason. He’s aghast because it is so un-important and obvious that we should be inclusive and let people be who they are or identify as. I’m aghast because it is so obvious that men (biologically speaking) should not be allowed in any female facility. That we’re even debating such a fundamental fact is proof of irreversible societal insanity.

Yes; there are some very important issues out there like the debt, immigration, terror… so why aren’t we addressing them? Because each has a moral component that we repeatedly prove we lack… We continually spend what our children and grandchildren must repay. We allow those who would do us harm free access across our borders, not to mention seek to fundamentally change our nation by allowing in those will will never assimilate (this being the price for votes and cheap labor). We have such self-loathing that we espouse moral equivalence with our terrorist enemies. And… We grant men (all men) free access to the private facilities of our mothers, sisters, wives, and daughters.

On issue after issue, we demonstrate decay. And don’t even get me started on rationality… We are insane with NO sign or hope of recovery.

Read Full Post »

Concept - Idea GarbageSo, let’s say you’re filling out a company employee questionnaire, and in this case one that is NOT anonymous. You get through the standard touchy, feely, how are we doing team questions when you come across… this.
Q: Are you a member of the X community?
Q: Are you an ally of the X community, but not personally identifying as X.

And remember… your employer will know who you are and how you answered (or even IF you answered).

So, how do you feel about that? How fair are those questions? Well for most of us I guess it would depend on the variable X. It shouldn’t.

    Let’s consider for a moment a few scenarios…

  • X = The NRA (National Rifle Association)
  • X = The Tea Party
  • X = The Occupy Movement
  • X = LGBT (Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender)
  • X = The National Socialist German Workers Party (NAZI)

Despite assurances from any company, I assure you there is a wrong and a right answer to these question. The company IS looking for a specific answer and there are possible consequences for a wrong answer… again… this is despite company assurances otherwise. So what do you do?

  1. Some will genuinely agree with the company position (probably in the affirmative) and answer truthfully with pride that the company supports and validates their opinions.
  2. Most will ascertain the answer the company wants (that’s easy enough) and put that as the answer. Duh! This, to the detriment of society and freedom, is the state of being most people find themselves in today.
  3. Some will not answer. This is not as bad as a wrong answer, but it’s still a red flag to be documented by said company. These are the guys summarily shot once the wall has been cleared of the first round of rabble.
  4. Some will genuinely disagree with the company position (probably in the negative) and… decide to lie and give the answer the company wants out of fear… (well justified fear).
  5. And a few, a very few will disagree with the company position and tell the truth out of conscience and possibly suffer the consequences. Depending on what X equals that could be the loss of opportunities, the loss of the job, or worse (much worse if you find yourself in a actualized fascist/socialist state).

Fascist - No Comment

This is where we are headed as a nation. This is yet another example of the erosion of freedom we face at an ever increasing pace. This is why the republic is doomed.


Fascism - LiberalFYI: In the actual case that prompted this posting: Company = Chase Bank and X = LGBT.

The left constantly (with the help of the MSM) push the propaganda of the right as the fascist. Bullsh@t! The left are the fascist in this day and age following the lead of the original socialists who perfected the art.

Read Full Post »

Rome - Fall of Empire[Our society is doomed. And there are certain signs of this: religious, political, and social. Here’s one…]

Brendan Eich (CEO of Mozilla) donated $1,000 in 2008 in support of California’s Proposition 8 and in defense of traditional marriage. It cost him his job. And the fascist largely responsible are contemplating going after others who committed the same offense.

Billionaire Warren Buffet, the “Oracle of Omaha”, has donated $1,200,000,000 (that $1.2 billion) to abortion groups (from 2001-2012). A paltry $289,811,421 went to Planned Parenthood.

This is one of the reasons we can dismiss out of hand the lofty self-aggrandizing claims of Warren Buffet (and Bill Gates and the like) when they say they will give away much of their fortunes. THIS is their definition of that charitable act.

Those who give a pittance to one cause are not even worthy of employment in today’s leftist society; while others who give billions to the right (meaning left) causes are carefully insulated from that information even reaching the public.

Read Full Post »

Comic - Shoe - 2013 08 07 - Fishnet Stockings

I’m reduced to citing inside jokes on my blog. So I’ll explain… because the inside jokes do say something about society and how work environments evolve to deal with the absurd.

At a previous employer in Houston, everyone was keenly aware of the politically correct atmosphere we had to work in. It was of course a leftist code of acceptance and almost Big Brother-ish. We (the employees) even came to make fun of the corporate BS in that we developed codes words, phrases and… inside jokes into our daily vernacular.

For example… In Houston, the police (as long as I lived there) had to raid city parks from time to time to stop all the homosexuals who would gather and proposition each other for sex in the bushes and bathrooms. The homosexuals would dissipate but soon would be gathering at another park. Cue the “Circle of Life” music.

A co-worker who jogged in Memorial park had a story for us at lunch one day. He had been propositioned in such a manner the evening before. The story involved him taking a break half way through his run and watching a game of some type (involving young black men) that was also very verbose. They were talking trash. Unknown to my friend anyone who stopped running in Memorial park was assumed to be asking for it. It, being robbed or… well, you know…

He was quickly approached by another man who broke the ice by saying “I can’t understand a word they are saying, and I’m a linguist.” The conversation went decidedly down-hill from there.

It was an interesting and funny (at the coworker’s expense) story. But the really interesting thing is from that point forward the noun “linguist” replaced any and all references to homosexuals within the office. And if you were ever trying to explain something technical or requiring some degree of cognitive deduction… someone was bound to say “I can’t understand a word you’re saying, and I’m a linguist.”

Another interesting phrase that cropped up in the office vernacular was “Not that there’s anything wrong with that.” If a conversation ever brought up a question of ethics, morality, or decent behavior… someone would immediately chime in “Not that there’s anything wrong with that”, implying the understood social norm that anything and everything is acceptable.

And that’s where we find ourselves today. Nothing is off limits other than judging something to be off-limits.

Sure, linguists approach and proposition anyone running in a park that has the gall to stop and catch their breath as he and his buddies hook up in the bushes and bathroom stalls. The police encourage them to move on to the next rendezvous every few months… Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

Read Full Post »

Logo - General Mills - 002June 2013 was “Gay Pride Month” and General Mills decided it would use its Lucky Charms cereal to celebrate and endorse the gay agenda. They started out with a campaign where you go to their web site and post a message (maybe to twitter or something) with the hash tag of #LuckyToBe. This ties in with the Lucky Charms cereal with the little Leprechaun running around. The marshmallow rainbows come into play somehow.

I could be wrong [Yeah, I know, very doubtful], but from what I’ve seen General Mills took the “have our cake and eat it too” approach in their support and love of the gay community/agenda. They conspicuously omitted their logo, and brands from the sites and advertising [Something some of us are happy to help them correct]. They tried to limit their advertising of their support to the leftist community.

Their press release to GLADD (Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation) read “We’re celebrating Pride month with whimsical delight, magical charms, and two new rainbow marshmallows. If you’re lucky enough to be different, we’re celebrating you.” Do you think they sent that press release to anyone who might get the message out to middle class moms out there?

This is one of those circumstances that confirms that leftist agendas and hypocrisy goes hand in hand.


General Mills Version… (click to enlarge)

Lucky Charms - Ad - 002

Helping them provide more information of exactly who and what they are doing… 🙂 (click to enlarge)

General Mills Uses Lucky the Leprechaun to Push Gay Agenda on Kids


And to help them really get their message out… (click to enlarge)

General Mills Uses Lucky the Leprechaun to Push Gay Agenda on Kids


OK, One more… (click to enlarge)

General Mills Uses Lucky the Leprechaun to Push Gay Agenda on Kids

Read Full Post »

Main Stream Media - Bias - Bet Your Sweet AssIn an announcement that was as big a surprise as Ellen DeGeneres coming out of the closet; Hillary Clinton announced that she is in favor of “same-sex marriage”. This is in contrast to being in favor of “civil unions” just few years ago.

The funny part of all this is watching the Main Stream Media pretend this is news; pretend this is a change in policy or opinion for Mrs. Clinton. It’s not; nor more so than President Barack Obama’s “evolving” opinion on the subject.

The news coverage implies that at some point in time they felt differently on the subject of homosexual marriage. That was never the case and everybody knows it. But we all have to do a kabuki theater and pretend otherwise.

People - Clinton, Hillary - WinkNot really wanting to debate “homosexual rights” or the morality of the subject; I’m more interested in the ability of the left (granted by the media) in being able to take positions in order to get elected and then completely change those positions once the political stars have aligned in their favor. Are there examples of this on the right? If so, are they as pronounced as this example? I just don’t think so.

The only thing that even slightly comes close on the right may be “illegal immigration”. And some conservatives changing their policy in support of a path to legalization and citizenship because they think they must to stay viable. But there are key differences here. 1) The initial depiction by the media as negative (no so for liberals) and 2) The actual change in position (even if only because of fear).

(Lynn Note: Just based on the last paragraph, I’ve decided to write a blog on how to solve the whole immigration issue (legal and illegal) so save your comments on that.) 🙂

Back to the subject at hand; the left gets away with a lot of this type of stuff. The pretend to support or oppose stuff when it’s politically expedient and toss it aside when the opportunity arises AND they are NEVER called on it.

The right enjoys no such benefit. Nor should they… but neither should the left. Liberal Media Bias? You Bet Your Sweet Ass!

Cartoon - Obama Evolve on Gay Marriage

Read Full Post »

Sign - Right Turn OnlySo here was an email from a liberal friend:


Dear Wise and Honorable TexasLynn,
Here’s a question I’d like to see you attack/address in your blog:

Let’s say I’m pretty liberal, socially. Don’t care about gays getting married or people smoking weed. Don’t think all illegal immigrants are bad and should be deported; some kind of practical program needs to be implemented.

But at the same time, I don’t really like unions, and think welfare has gotten out of hand. I’d be willing to accept adjustments to Social Security and Medicare (push out qualification age, reduce benefits), but I don’t want either chopped in half or replaced with private accounts. I support some basic safety net. I also support gun ownership, and don’t see a need for increased gun control.

Why should I vote Republican?


OK… fair enough… But the answer to your question depends on the value you place on each issue. Since I know you place social issues above financial (just like I do); the answer is that under the current Republican stances on those issues, you shouldn’t vote for them.

At the same time I must say that I’m not really the person to ask. I don’t consider myself a Republican. I do vote for them out of choosing the lesser evil. But at the same time; I’m one of those who is batteling for the soul (and direction) of the Republican Party and failing that… I’ll abandon them. If I/we are successful; then I doubt you’ll ever want to support them. If I/we fail, then take another look at them.

I will be glad to make an argument aimed at a generic liberal someone as described above. But to do that I have to argue that the liberal must choose to ignore the social issues for now in the interest of saving the nation so that the social issue ever eventually matter. So let me give it a try. 🙂


Forward - CliffOverall Why You Should Support the Republican Party Right Now:
The key to my argument is this. You will likely eventually win the social issues despite the current opposition of the Republican Party. But winning on those social issues will only matter if you FIRST save the country from the fiscal collapse being orchestrated and implemented by the Democratic Party. If you don’t choose to do this; then none of the other stuff really matters. Sure gays will be given legal marriage so they can get what? Non-existent federal benefits that don’t exist anymore because of the economic collapse?

So I argue you should set aside your objections to social issues in the immediate and dire interest of the economic survival of the country.

As a collective the Democratic Party does not think there is a spending problem, or a dept problem. The Democratic Party does not think that ANY spending should be curtailed and does not think any reforms of social programs are necessary.

[Side Note: Mary Landrieu (Moron Senator from our neighboring state of Louisiana) very recently said as much. “I am not going to keep cutting the discretionary budget which, by the way, is not out of control despite what you hear on Fox News. It’s mandatory spending that is rising rapidly because the greatest generation that gave us the greatest nation the world has ever heard is dying. And they need hospice care, they need Social Security and they need hospitals.” Of course she used the same old Democratic scare tactic of Republicans out to get old people and Social Security to justify her (and Obamas) continued unfettered spending spree.]

[Chorus:] You know this to be true! And you know that minor tweaks aren’t going to do the job. And you know the Democrats aren’t even willing to do the minor tweaks; much less anything meaningful that will ensure viability. Again I say it’s really too late; BUT say I’m wrong and it isn’t. If this is not addressed eventually (and sooner than you think), if you do not empower those who are part of the solution and not the problem, NO ONE will receive ANY “safety net” program because none of them will exists any longer and all these questions will be moot. It is imperative that this be fixed (preferably yesterday) and the Republicans are the ONLY chance this will happen, EVER!

[Note: As I wrote this post I discovered that this little paragraph needed to be repeated over and over again… like a chorus in a song. So… 🙂 when you see the words Chorus: jump back and re-read the above argument/paragraph. Thank you!]

Now stop! You’re thinking one of two things right now.
1. You’re thinking that TexasLynn is right about the dire straits we find ourselves in.
or
2. You’re thinking that TexasLynn is wrong or exaggerating the situation.

My whole argument is based on you realizing the seriousness of the situation. If you’re not there. If you think we are not on the cusp of national fiscal collapse (I’m talking within the next 2-6 years)… READ NO FURTHER. My argument is completely dependent on that understanding. Eat, drink, be merry, and vote Democrat… and stop right here.


Look… I said, read no further if you chose Option 2… and I mean it…

OK? OK… so let’s look at individual issues…

Individual Issues:

Homosexual - Holywood PropagandaIssue: Gay rights/marriage: Understand that because of the direction of young people and the world, I believe you (the left) will eventually win this battle. I personally think its a moral travesty; but it is the direction things are going. Right now the Republican Party by majority of it’s members are against you. A third are totally with you. A third are totally against you. And a third don’t care, but realize that they can’t afford to lose the social conservatives.

So my argument is don’t worry about this issue. The propaganda in the schools, and TV, and the movies has worked. You’ve got the hearts and minds of the children where you want them. You just need to wait for a few more to reach voting age. Save the country fiscally and then come back to this inevitable victory. If it makes you feel any better join the third of the Republicans that support the issue and try and change the Party from within.

Now I’ll be honest. As a conservative I’ll do my best to turn the tide; and I’ll do so from within the Republican Party. If I fail, I’ll abandon them and you can have the whole Party all to yourself…

Drugs - Joint SmokeIssue: Smoking weed: You’re probably not on as solid ground on this one as gay rights. Republicans see weed as a gateway drug, and weighing the benefits (lack of criminality/medical/”freedom”) vs. the damage (stoned losers and their effect on society and the cost involved); Republicans have done the math and have decided it’s not the way to go. But Really!? Is this that big of an issue when compared to fiscal oblivion? You may get your wish on this one when the economy collapse and we’ve got a lot bigger things to worry about; but I’d recommend saving the nation instead.

Issues: Immigration: The Republican Party is closer to your position than you think on this. You’re description of the Republican stance matches what the misinformation the MSM has pushed with great effect.

    Here is a line item list of where I think a majority of Republicans stand:

  1. It is irrational to believe that we can deport all illegal aliens.
  2. Step one in Statue of Liberty - Sketch2any immigration solution is to secure the border. Until this is done, no reform really matters. This is a major distinction between the Republicans and Democrats. The Democrats have no interest in border security. They view illegal immigration as a gold mine of votes and class warfare.
  3. Current undocumented people should be registered and processed. Those who work and have contributed to society should be given work visas and a path to citizenship. A path that puts them behind all those who followed the legal process.
  4. The legal process to becoming a citizen is a bureaucratic nightmare. It must be streamlined and revamped. At the same time we should revamp immigration policy to reflect who we want and who we don’t. I’d say Republicans would emphasize those who would work and integrate into our society.
  5. As part of the process of registering and processing the undocumented. Those on perpetual welfare and those with any level of criminality of say drunk driving and above should be deported. Another key distinction between Democrats and Republicans. So if you agree with the above; you should have no problem voting Republican.

Welfare LineIssue: Social Safety Net: Republicans would greatly revamp the social safety net if given the opportunity. It is an absolute necessity if the nation is to survive and not go bankrupt.

[Note: I have written extensively on how the social safety net should be revamped and why that is only possible by ripping up the current system by the roots. I decided it will be easier to just quote myself in order to explain the conservative/Republican position and thus why they deserve your support over the Democrats… So here we go…]

From: John Stewart’s 19 Questions on how and why the social safety net should be minimal.

A limited social safety net can enhance freedom; but an unchecked one does (has done) the opposite. Our current unchecked social safety net ensnares generations of people to poverty and dependence. A “plantation” is created to house the ensnared. The masters only require the slaves to empower them with allegiance and votes year after year. THAT system has been working perfectly since LBJ refined and perfected it almost half a century ago.

A limited social safety net would protect citizens from death and extreme hardship; but it would also promote getting off the dole. The main issue in promoting independence is in not providing too much aid as to promote complete dependence and complacency.

Need help with food? Under the social safety net you will not starve. You’ll receive rice, beans and other basics; but you will not just be handed a black check or credit card to buy what you want.

Need help with housing? Under the social safety net you will not die from exposure. But if you’re living off your fellow citizens and have Cable TV and other luxuries, something is wrong.

Living on the social safety net isn’t a right. It is charity. Self-Esteem is not the priority in the slightest. With that in mind, participants may have certain responsibilities while being supported. Among them may (and should) be, no drugs, no alcohol, a work program…

Would being supported by the social safety net be pleasant? No, that’s not its purpose. Its purpose is to support the people until they can make it on their own.

From Pulling the Cart on why the system must be destroyed and rebuilt from scratch

We have millions of children on school lunches; not because that many children were going hungry; but because the government bureaucratic system that doles out the lunches needs to be sure it continues to justify its existence and generate the government jobs. So Schools are ensnared in getting as many kids to sign up with stipends on a per child basis. One of the requirements to qualify? “I just don’t have time to fix a good breakfast every morning.” Donald Trump could answer yes to that…

We have millions more people on food stamps today than four years ago. Like the school lunch program the food stamp bureaucracy must be fed and perpetuated; and more and more dependency is what makes that possible. There is zero, NO, incentive on the individual or the system to eventually move on from food stamps… only to get on and stay on.

We not only have people on these programs for years; we have people on these programs for generations. This fact alone should tell us this isn’t working and it’s time to start from scratch.

We provide hundreds of days in unemployment insurance. This program is slowly transforming into a welfare system. I’ve talked to managers at plants who can tell you to the day certain employees will leave his/her job because that is the day they qualify for unemployment.

And NOW people have learned the next scam of the system… after unemployment insurance runs out don’t just get another job go for retirement through disability. A check for life for nothin’. Again a perfectly good system for a valid cause corrupted by government bureaucracy. Millions of men and women who are perfectly fit to work are now on permanent disability.

The whole government bureaucratic system has evolved to where it seeks out and encourages people to give up and become wards of the state. And once they are part of this system you can depend on each and every one to vote to perpetuate it.

So… with all that said… please refer back to the [Chorus: You know this be true… minor tweaks won’t work… Democrats aren’t willing… really too late… might be wrong… imperative to fix… Republicans only hope.]

People - Elderly - Social Security CheckIssue: Social Security: This program will never work so long as the money flows through Washington. Washington will steal (has stolen) it and replaced it with IOUs. Washington will use it to run a massive bureaucracy. This has to stop. Social Security as it has evolved is a pyramid scheme that is guaranteed to collapse and likely to bankrupt the nation. It is only a question of when.

I and Republicans agree that the promises to today’s senior citizens must be honored; but a plan must be implemented to migrate from a government system (which by definition will never work) to a private system. ANY other solution that sends the money through Washington will fail by design.

And… [Chorus: You know this be true… minor tweaks won’t work… Democrats aren’t willing… really too late… might be wrong… imperative to fix… Republicans only hope.]

Issue: Medicare: This program should be rolled into the medical side of the social safety net; described above. Like social security Medicare is guaranteed to collapse and likely to bankrupt the nation. It is only a question of when. Re-read my arguments on Social Security… they are the same reasons Medicare is not viable or feasible.

And… [Chorus: You know this be true… minor tweaks won’t work… Democrats aren’t willing… really too late… might be wrong… imperative to fix… Republicans only hope.]

Union - Forced DuesIssue: Unions: Look, Republicans aren’t anti-Union. Created for the right purpose they are a great good for workers, business, and society. Few if any of that definition of Union exists anymore. The unions have evolved into parasites on American business and society. The very idea that someone must join or donate to a Union against their will is ludicrous. Republicans understand his. Democrats may or may not understand it but it doesn’t matter. The Unions are a simple subsidiary of the Party.

Like anything else that has evolved into something this horrible and evil, there is no reforming Unions. You just have to oppose them and start from scratch. Luckily, this is as simple as following the Constitution’s 1st Amendment of freedom of association (and freedom to not associate). It’s called right to work and you simply make it illegal to force someone to join or donate to a union as a condition of employment.

History - Nazi - Kiev Jew Killings in Ivangorod (1942)Issue: The Second Amendment: You are closer to the Democratic position than you think. The purpose of the Second Amendment (despite the complete ignorance of politicians, the MSM, and the general public) is to be the final check against an abusive and tyrannical government. The benefits of protection and hunting are secondary benefits. The founding fathers were aware of them… but they were secondary in purpose. That being the case, the access and power of arms the people should have access to is substantial; including assault weapons, large clips, and ammunition.

We have a separate violent culture problem, a moral fabric of the nation problem, and a system that lets nutballs with obvious and dangerous mental health problems run lose problem. Those need to be addressed.

This basic civil right (the 2nd Amendment) will become even more important if you choose not to stop the reckless Democratic fiscal policies. It will be one of the essential tools needed by the people to have any chance of eventually rebuilding from the collapse.


Conclusion:
So that’s it. That’s my argument. Unless you decide to stop the Democratic Party’s irresponsible, and eventually catastrophic fiscal policy; all the liberal social issues that are so important to you, all the safety net issues won’t matter; because our posterity will be concentrating on much more important issues in their lives… literally finding their next meal.

Read Full Post »

The town of Gopher Spits has a social problem. They have men, grown men, pissing and defecating in public and in plain sight. Drunks are either passed out on park benches and entrances to buildings or aggressively panhandling and aggravating pedestrians. The anti-social behavior is everywhere and it is bewildering to the citizens of Gopher Spits.

It’s really strange for a town like Gopher Spits to have this problem when they are known for their acceptance and open mindedness. For example, the town offers free food, booze and drugs to the homeless. And there’s the town motto, “Bums, Bums, Bums, We Love ’em and Coddle ’em Here! You can’t beat GS if You’re a Bum!”

Anyway, Go figure…

On a completely unrelated topic; San Francisco is having a problem with nudists and exhibitionists. (If there is a difference.)

City Supervisor Scott Weiner [I’m not making this up] has proposed an ordinance to make it illegal for people to “expose his or her genitals, perineum or anal region on any public street, sidewalk, street median, parklet or plaza”. And he catching absolute heck for it; the extremists bastard!

In his defense tough, “Exemptions would be made for participants at permitted street fairs and parades, such as the city’s annual gay pride event and the Folsom Street Fair, which celebrates sadomasochism and other sexual subcultures.” [Well duh.] * Associated Press

Luckily, sane moderate voices have chimed in. “Stripped down to his sunglasses and hiking boots, McCray Winpsett, 37, said he understands the disgust of residents who would prefer not to see the body modifications and sex enhancement devices sported by some of the Castro nudists. But he thinks Wiener’s prohibition goes too far in undermining a tradition ‘that keeps San Francisco weird… A few lewd exhibitionists are really ruining it for the rest of us.'” * Associated Press

Anyway, Go figure…

Read Full Post »

  • The DNC removed the term “God given” in one section the platform describing people’s potential.
  • The DNC platform dropped the recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. The removed wording was “Jerusalem is and will remain the capital of Israel.”
  • The DNC platform dropped its stance “to isolate Hamas until it renounces terrorism, recognizes Israel’s right to exist, and abides by past agreements.”
  • The DNC added much more emphasis on climate change (previously referred to as global warming). (18 references)
  • The DNC mentions the deficit half as much as climate change. (9 references)
  • The DNC omitted any reference to the balancing the budget. (0 references)
  • The DNC strengthened its support of abortion on demand.
  • The DNC added support for same-sex marriage.
  • There are a record number of Muslim delegates attending the DNC. (about 100)
  • There are a record number of gay delegates attending the DNC. (about 400)

I’m not saying that any one of these is good or bad. I just think they help reveal what the Democratic Party stands for.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »