Erin Burnett (rising star of CNN and thus a liberal) is a “skeeter”. Someone who questions Barack Obama’s claim that he goes skeet shooting “all the time”.
“Obama the skeet shooter. Yeah, I’m not making this up. I mean, if someone is, it isn’t me.” – Erin Burnett (CNN)
I (TexasLynn) am appalled that anyone would question the President’s claim. I never doubted it for a minute. Who would dare to even think that the President was some “effete gun-hating pansy ass”. To quell the racist questioning of his honesty I submit this picture of the President “shooting skeet”. It comes from the good people at HopeNChange but I assume it was originally released by the White House.
Now now, if he were a Muslim he’d know how to fire a gun. Get your hate straight.
Muslim? Christian? Pachamama? As Hilary said “What does it matter?!” Hopefully we can all come together in love and harmony and agree… on “pansy ass”.
You just won’t be committed to one version of hating this guy, will you? He’s a closet Muslim/overt socialist on the same brutal path as Mao Tse Tung, yet he’s also an America-apologizing wimp who’s afraid of guns and red meat. Pick a persona! He can’t be Chamberlain and Hitler.
>> (Bitch, Bitch, Bitch)
You remind me of an old cartoon I found very humorous.
It pictured a man standing at the counter of a bookstore. The caption is the clerk replying to his question…
“Sir, this is a feminist book store. There is no humor section.”
Just replace feminist with liberal. One is a subset of the other after all…
>> You just won’t be committed to one version of hating this guy
I won’t deny it. I do dislike the man; as I do most people who serve evil. (I do pity a few who do so unwittingly.)
>> He’s a closet Muslim
He loved the sound of Muslims being called to prayer as a child. He was heavily influenced by the culture. I don’t really think he’s a Muslim because that would require faith and a belief in a higher power; and I just don’t think he has that in him.
That won’t stop me from making fun of the obvious influence it (Muslim/Islam) has had on the man.
>> overt socialist
Nothing overt about it.
>> the same brutal path as Mao Tse Tung
As is all socialism and communism.
>> Yet he’s also an America-apologizing
Can that even be debated? He goes on tours to make those speeches…
>> wimp
My exact words were “pansy ass”; but close enough.
I picture him as the curtain hanging type. Reagan and W. Bush could easily be pictured with a powersaw clearing brush.
>> who’s afraid of guns
No “afraid”… “gun-hating”
>> and red meat.
I didn’t mention read meat; but now that you mention it; Michelle probably does have him $%$#*-whipped in that area.
>> Pick a persona!
As I have just demonstrated… they all fit just fine.
>> He can’t be Chamberlain and Hitler.
I only see him as a possible Chamberlin… paving the road for Hitler (foreign dictator/aggressor)
More likely he is a type of Lenin, paving the way for Stalin (a home grown tyrant/terror).
Man you make this easy…
>He loved the sound of Muslims being called to prayer as a child
How dare he be ethnic. But wait… he’s really an atheist. Or a Christian with a racist church. Or a Muslim. Or… *he’s someone Lynn doesn’t like.* And that’s fine. Let’s just leave it at that, without all the armchair psychoanalysis.
>Nothing overt about it.
Sigh. Overt means “in the open.” Covert means “hidden.” When you learned programming, did you have to forget English?
>He goes on tours to make those speeches…
That is such an old, tired, and flatly wrong conservative trope. The president never said he or America was sorry for anything. There are plenty of things you can criticize him for, but that one is just a load of donkey fritters.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/aug/31/mitt-romney/mitt-romney-said-barack-obama-began-his-presidency/
>I picture him as the curtain hanging type. Reagan and W. Bush could easily be pictured with a powersaw clearing brush.
Ah… now I get it. Now I get the whole gay/feminine-fear thing. You don’t want (what you perceive as) powerless/girly-men getting equal power. Riding horses and clearing brush aren’t relevant leadership skills — but they look manly, dammit, and that’s what matters.
Look, if being an outdoorsy were a sign of leadership, you should have voted for Ann Richards instead of W for governor. She’s a better hunter..
>More likely he is a type of Lenin, paving the way for Stalin (a home grown tyrant/terror).
Ah! So even in his second term, after spending five years painting him as everything from the anti-Christ to Hitler, you don’t really fear him, but what will come after him. Man, you’ve got this prophecy thing down pat! If it doesn’t happen as predicted, re-interpret the signs and push out the date, but for the don’t imagine you were actually wrong!
Man, I’d love to live in Johnsonville. The views are always majestic, the enemy is always at the gate, and we’re always the last bastion of freedom in a dark and gloomy world.
It’s noble and exciting, I’ll grant you that. Realistic? Not even close. But, no romance ever is.
>> How dare he be ethnic. But wait… he’s really an atheist.
It’s real simple. He was influenced by the Muslim culture… said so himself… and his actions bear that out. I admit that I consider that a negative, and have no problem pointing out and making light of it.
He claims to be a Christian… said so himself… though his actions (fruits) don’t bear that out.
He may or may not be… no one can say for sure; we can only watch and judge by the fruits of his actions. And because of those actions and their fruits/results I refuse to give him the benefit of the doubt any more than if he claimed to be a fiddler crab. It’s between him and God.
I have my doubts so I blog my opinion that based on the evidence of his actions I don’t think he is a man of faith… Christian, Muslim, or otherwise… This is simply an objective conclusion based on the facts.
>> Or a Christian with a racist church. Or a Muslim. Or…
The Christian issue is explained above… He’s a Christian… He’s a fiddler crab… whatever.
As for churches… church does not a Christian make. You can go for social reasons… you can go for political appearances… whatever… You could ask Obama but why would you trust his answer?
Instead, look at Obama’s churches, and spiritual leaders and congregants… They all seem to share a common racist ideology that’s been demonstrated and documented repeatedly. (See black liberation theology) More fruit to help point to the truth of what Obama is.
>> Or a Muslim. Or…
Already said… don’t think he’s a Muslim.
>> he’s someone Lynn doesn’t like. And that’s fine.
Yep… evil… don’t like…
>> Let’s just leave it at that, without all the armchair psychoanalysis.
Why? Why leave it at that? What the &^%$ is a blog for it not to offer an opinion (psychoanalytical or otherwise) and present ones reasons and evidence for that opinion?
Not to mention you seem to infer it’s a horrible thing for me to psychoanalyze Obama (or any other leftist)… But YOU managed to psychoanalyze me before you finish your comment…
“Ah… now I get it… whole gay/feminine-fear thing… Man, I’d love to live in Johnsonville…”[Eye-roll]
>> Sigh. Overt means “in the open.” Covert means “hidden.”
Sorry. My bad… He IS an OVERT socialist.
>> That (apology for U.S.) is such an old, tired, and flatly wrong conservative trope.
That man has bumped his head on way too many dictator’s penises (mostly Islamic) while representing the United States. Yes, I’m referring to all the bowing.
You guys (the left) go through major mental contortions to conclude that Obama wasn’t a leftist American apologist. He went on these foreign tours (mostly in the Middle East) and stated in addresses to their leaders that the U.S. was wrong on various policies mostly concerning that region. He WAS apologizing in hopes of getting them to play nice; and it failed miserably because (in the Muslim Culture) they didn’t respect him and saw him as weak… or maybe… in other words… as a pansy. And what do you know; in this case Obama appearing to be a pansy had political, diplomatic, and leadership ramifications that were horrible for the U.S.
The left’s argument that Obama didn’t apologize, centers on the fact that he didn’t use the actual words “sorry” or “apologize”. It’s not intellectually honest; but it is a standard Orwellian logical and linguistic contortion used by the left and politifact (redundant) all the time.
So please spare me the “analysis” of politifact… They are not the neutral, unbiased, truth seekers you pretend them to be. I have no more interest in or respect of their opinion than you do of Breitbart or Limbaugh.
(I thought I settled that in a previous post on the politifact claim that of one of the “biggest lies” of the campaign was Romney saying Jeep was moving some manufacturing oversees. Romney was right and they were; but politifact “logically” deduced that Romney lied because Jeep caved in to pressure from Obama to wait until after the election. Thus the claim while initially true, was no longer true, and thus a huge lie even though it would probably (and was) true again after the election. Typical leftist… Now that Jeep is moving forward with those plans what do we hear from politifact… apologies?… corrections?… nope, just crickets chirping.)
>> Ah… now I get it. Now I get the whole gay/feminine-fear thing.
He’s a pansy. I gave you an example that pretty well any honest person would agree with. Really two examples when you also consider the head butting penis example above. (And no; it’s not meant to be taken literally. It’s only to euphemism to humorously emphasize the all the apologetic bowing.) (Oh crap… I just realized you’ll psychoanalyze this as another gay fear thing… Spare me… I assure you I only meant it as a dominance/respect/non-gay pansy thing.)
While I’m on the subject, I never mentioned gay… YOU did (You always do)… YOU associated pansy with gay which to me is appalling… quit stereotyping… and quit projecting your stereotyping on to me.
And Uggg… Here we go again… every post/comment gets back to the gay crap… Is there any wonder why I have deduced that there is a COVERT reason (that will eventually become OVERT) for your infatuation with homosexuality.
>> Look, if being an outdoorsy were a sign of leadership, you should have voted for Ann Richards instead of W for governor. She’s a better hunter.
W. W. W… and I have an irrational “hatred” of Obama…
And Puuulease… As the real thing, I know a poser/fake hunter when I see one… and Ann Richards easily fits that bill. That b!#ch never held a gun (or hunted) in her adult life unless there was a camera there to take her picture for a photo op and propaganda.
>> Man, I’d love to live in Johnsonville. The views are always majestic, the enemy is always at the gate, and we’re always the last bastion of freedom in a dark and gloomy world.
Thank you for the psychoanalysis…
And for the record… Johnsonville sure as hell beats “Hope and Change” world. I sure “hope” the national economy doesn’t eventually collapse under $16 (soon to be $20 trillion) in debt. FORWARD as she goes… European socialism (and bankruptcy) here we come.
And I’m the irrational one…
I see my mistake now. Ah, clarity.